The Trump Organization, Stormy Daniels, and a Manhattan district attorney’s investigation of an alleged affair between Trump and the National Enquirer
Two days after Pecker’s testimony, there were multiple reports that the grand jury was going into a pre-planned break in April. The Trump case was not expected to be heard by the grand jury.
Trump wasn’t charged personally in that case. Bragg’s team seemed to get more focused on Trump and the payment of the hush money.
They waited. Jurors were not told to come in when the grand jury was supposed to meet the next day. Bragg and his top prosecutors huddled the rest of the week and over the weekend to determine a strategy that would effectively counter Costello’s testimony in the grand jury.
Prosecutors continued bringing in witnesses, including Pecker, the former head of American Media Inc., which publishes the National Enquirer. In February, the Trump Organisation was created. controller testified before grand jury Members of Trump’s 2016 campaign, including Kellyanne Conway and Hope Hicks, also appeared. Daniels met with prosecutors, her attorney said.
A source close to the event says that after the indictment, Trump ate dinner and greeted guests at his Mar-a-Lago club.
There are questions whether the Manhattan district attorney’s case is the strongest against the former president amid investigations in Washington, DC and Georgia about his efforts to overturn the 2020 election and his handling of classified documents at his Florida resort.
But it’s the Manhattan indictment, dating back to a payment made before the 2016 presidential election, that now sees Trump facing down criminal charges for the first time as he runs again for the White House in 2024.
Stormy Daniels was paid $130,000 by Cohen in order to keep quiet about an alleged affair with Trump. Trump denied the affair. Cohen was later reimbursed $420,000 by the Trump Organization to cover the original payment and tax liabilities and to reward him with a bonus.
At the time, federal prosecutors had determined they could not seek to indict Trump in the scheme because of US Justice Department regulations against charging a sitting president. In 2021, after Trump left the White House, prosecutors in the Southern District of New York decided not to pursue a case against Trump, according to a recent book from CNN senior legal analyst Elie Honig.
Vance’s investigation broadened to the Trump Org.’s finances. New York prosecutors went to the Supreme Court twice to enforce a subpoena for Trump’s tax records from his long-time accounting firm Mazars USA. The Trump Organization and Weisselberg were indicted on tax fraud and other charges in June of 2021 for running an off-the-books compensation scheme for over a decade.
Weisselberg was sentenced to five months in Rikers Island after he pleaded guilty to the charges. Prosecutors had hoped to flip Weisselberg to cooperate against Trump, but he would not tie Trump to any wrongdoing.
The disagreements over the pace of the investigation caused at least three career prosecutors to leave the investigation. CNN reported last year that they were worried that the investigation was moving too quickly without enough evidence to support possible charges.
The attorneys were given the authority to give evidence to the grand jury by the end of the year, but they didn’t get an indictment. Those close to Vance say he wanted to leave the decision to Bragg, the newly elected district attorney.
“(Manhattan District Attorney Alvin) Bragg’s predecessor didn’t take up the case. The Justice Department didn’t take up the case,” wrote Bush, one of Trump’s top 2016 presidential rivals.
According to CNN, Pomerantz wrote in a letter that the decision not to authorize prosecution will doom any future chances that Mr. Trump will be prosecuted for criminal conduct.
The prosecutors were building a case that included years of financial statements and payments to keep the case quiet, people with direct knowledge of the investigation told CNN. The prosecutors thought there was a good chance a felony would be dropped due to a novel legal theory.
“Investigations are not linear so we are following the leads in front of us. That’s what we’re doing,” Bragg told CNN in April 2022. The investigation is going on.
Bragg was continuing his criminal investigation of Trump last year when another prosecution against the Trump company began. In December, two Trump Org. The maximum penalty was $1.6 million after the 17 entities were convicted at trial.
Cohen was brought back in to meet with Manhattan prosecutors. Cohen had previously met with prosecutors more than a dozen times during the investigation. But the January meeting was the first in more than a year – and a clear sign of the direction prosecutors were taking.
The Donald Trump Indictment and the Hesitance of the Post-Trump Promise Land. A New Insight into the Role of the New York Criminal Courts
Asked about Bragg’s hesitance, Pomerantz said: “I can’t speak in detail about what went through his mind. I believe that he was not happy with the strength of the case at the time.
The Trump attorney Susan Necheles told CNN that she met with New York prosecutors to argue that they shouldn’t indict Trump.
Trump’s call for protests after a potential indictment led to meetings between senior staff members from the district attorney’s office, the New York Police Department and the New York State Court Officers – who provide security at the criminal court building in lower Manhattan.
During the void, Trump continued to launch verbal insults against Bragg, calling him a “degenerate psychopath.” Bragg said that four Republican chairs of the most powerful House committees wrote to him, asking for information about a local investigation. An envelope containing a suspicious white powder and a death threat to Bragg was to delivered to the building where the grand jury meets – the powder was deemed nonhazardous.
The grand jury met again on Monday, March 27 but it wasn’t until that day that Pecker was taken to the grand jury in a government car in a failed attempt to hide from the media.
Pecker, a longtime friend of Trump’s who had a history of orchestrating so-called “catch and kill” deals while at the National Enquirer, was involved with the Daniels’ deal from the beginning.
I assume there is a presumption among analysts that Republicans will be stuck with Donald Trump even if they disagree with him. They will stop at the edge of a post- Trump promised land, gazing pathetically across the Jordan, because they did not take a righteous stand against him.
A certain part of the media narrative was already turning against DeSantis, or at least downgrading his chances, in part because he hasn’t yet swung back hard at any of Trump’s wild attacks. The indictment of the governor of Florida, along with most of the G.O.P. leadership, is likely to change the narrative that leading Republicans can’t ever turn on Trump, and they will be condemned to nominate.
In reality, the electoral politics of the indictment are just as murky as they were when it was just a hypothetical. A world where a political prosecution bonds wavering conservatives to Trump, and makes his path to the nomination easier, can be imagined. But one can equally imagine a world where the sheer mess involved in his tangle with the legal system ends up being a reason for even some Trump fans to move on to another choice. The poll from Echelon Insights shows a swing in favor of DeSantis if an indictment were to happen.
Republican lawmakers and former elected officials have spoken out about former President Donald Trump’s historic indictment, many of them dismissing the allegations of misconduct as politically motivated.
Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush: Bush defended Trump, calling the the Manhattan grand jury indictment “very political” and “not a matter of justice” in a tweet Saturday morning.
Bush called for a Republican to challenge Trump in his bid for reelection in 2020. Trump lobbed insults at Bush on multiple occasions during the 2016 Republican primary before Bush suspended his campaign. The former governor said he wouldn’t vote for Trump.
Why the New York Grand Jury Indictment is a “political hit job” for the prosecutorial function of the attorney general
In his remarks on Friday, Youngkin called for the US to stop politics like this and instead focus on helping Virginia residents.
Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski: Murkowski warned in a statement to CNN against “rushing to individual judgment” on Trump’s indictment before hearing the evidence.
I am keeping an eye on Donald Trump’s legal situation. Everyone deserves a fair legal process despite the fact that no one is above the law. The indictment of a former President is unprecedented and must be handled with the utmost integrity and scrutiny,” she wrote. It’s better to assess the evidence as it becomes available and use it to make better decisions than to rush to judgement.
Former Attorney General Bill Barr: Barr, who served as attorney general under the Trump administration before stepping down over the former president’s election lies, called the indictment a “political hit job,” arguing that it’s a “weak case.”
“It’s the archetypal abuse of the prosecutorial function,” Barr said at the National Review Institute summit held in Washington, DC. If it turns out to be the case it’s a disgrace.
Barr thought that it would damage the Republican Party. He called it a no-lose situation for Democrats because they could either give the nomination to Trump, or leave the eventual nominee with another scandal to deal with.
When the news broke of the New York grand jury indictment of Trump, DeSantis issued a similar statement that didn’t mention the former president.
“That is when you know that the law has been weaponized for political purposes; that is when you know that the left is using that to target their political opponent,” DeSantis said.
Comment on “Bragg’s predecessor didn’t take up the charge” [J.D.C.A. Phys. Lett. A 16-page reply to “Comment on ‘Two years of
“Bragg’s predecessor didn’t take up the case. Bush wrote that the case was not taken up by the Justice Department.